But it is not as soon as the society sees, it is not as soon as acts and also it is not as soon as the social classes if they express. In accordance with Rouse (apud BARNARD, 2003), until the end of century XVIII, as many men how much elegant women dressed ' ' golas well pleated, cut suits, skins, jewels, wigs, rendas' ' , etc. Today this behavior of dressing, that is, as to behave it dressing, not condiz with the reality in coherent way. Before the women were discreter and pompous when dressing, to revs of today, where the exposition of some parts of the body if became a sensuality signal. In turn, the men, have times behind were fancier, to the step that today are contained and do not search air more cool, pulling for one I appeal more basic and/or sophisticated.
Traces that they send to the past, but not plus all are always used to advantage the together elements. Cut suits are chic, skins are acceptable when synthetic (in case that contrary they can occasion a effect reverse), jewels are atemporais, incomes are elements of romantismo and sensuality always explored by the branch of the fashion, but none of them ally the wigs would go to sound as comercializvel or then imaginable in the streets. They are uses that had fallen in disuse Differences of sort, but also of style, common-sense, taste. It after all does not mean that the society has not accepted old forms of if dressing, the fashion if it recycle, but express in the reality the adequacy of the individual what the society judges adequate or inadequate. It is therefore that the fashion reproduces the society to the measure that is made for this. After reading of book of Malcolm Barnard is possible to declare with rationality, that is the society that it chooses, is the society that consumes.